Work Session, 1/14/09

present: Marc, Dale, Jeff B, Barbara

Shortish session tonight. Dale put up the poster version of Marc’s part-2 [rtf] that we had analyzed back in December and Marc chatted about what he saw.

Then Marc started us off on a quick toss exercise using the Vocal Sequence as a basis. This lasted about 30 minutes, using the text She sounds like she can no longer tolerate anything the rest of them are saying.

We sat and talked about the process, the ways it might be useful and some of the things we noticed when we were working. One thing we agreed on was that it would be very helpful to videotape our work, and/or to have more people involved who could watch and notate things they found interesting. Marc talked about using that kind of process in his past work.

One of our concerns, articulated by Barbara, was the uncomfortable feeling we had about movement. Dale suggested that we get one of the NSOD teachers, Annette, to come teach us contact improv as a means of developing those skills.

Dale had written a piece, a simple catalog/list of the items on his totally trashed desk. Jeff read it for us. We talked about having a video/slideshow to accompany it.

Dale brought up a couple of shows currently in NYC that caught his eye because it seemed that they had used the same kinds of processes that we’ve been playing with. The discussion turned to our eventual “results,” and when Marc asked “What is it you want to see?,” Dale asked everyone to envision a performance by us and to scribble down notes.

They were as follows:

Marc:

  • informal & prof0undly altering, at once
  • something we found unexpectedly
  • somewhat musical, somewhat overwhelming
  • I am not an earnest person, but I like to travel miles in all directions
  • 2 hrs. of Jeff laughing at me
  • something kind of thick
  • …and stories, of course

Barbara:

  • minimal costumes/set/props
  • lights, voice, movement, text* leveraged for an expression of what’s beautiful & true about ourselves
    • *the texts are questions, theorems, proofs, writings, stories, character

Dale:

  • familiar vs. unfamiliar texts
  • choral deconstruction
  • postmodern pastiche: skits, monologs, more
  • moments of true emotion
  • topic(s) that resonate with our audience
  • !!organic forward movement –> beginning, middle, end
  • comedy, confession, confusion
  • moments of elaborate stagecraft in a poor theatre kind of way
  • roll of white butcher paper, strewn, crumpled, utilized

Jeff:

  • Us.
    • (Not NYC)

Jeff and Barbara had to leave early to attend to family; Marc and Dale stayed and chatted about how to proceed and what shape our explorations might take.

  • Marc is going to think about ways to develop Vocal Sequence duo/trio work.
  • Dale has an idea for a piece, “We’re Queer,” that might give us a topic to work with, i.e., the nature of being a creative person in an uncreative setting. (Marc, talk in comments about your idea of a hoax, and then see here and here.)
  • Dale will look at possible exercises based on the ideas in Structuring Drama Work. (Keep your eye on the blog between now and then. If he comes up with something, it will appear here as an assignment to bring stuff in for.)

NEXT: Jan. 21, 6:30, NSOD

  • TEXTS: part-2, Jeff’s Myth [doc]
  • PATHS: Vocal Sequence
  • HOMEWORK:
    • (Neo-Futurist script)
    • keep bringing in text, either randomly selected from one’s own library, or some online library like Forgotten Books; multiple sources OK; we’re dumping these in our box for use… somehow
    • possible assignment based on Structuring Drama Work

Work Session, 1/7/09

present: Dale, Jeff B., Barbara, Jeff A.

Dale unrolled the triple-poster printout of Marc’s part-2 text [rtf], only to find that instead of the version everyone worked on in the 12/17/08 session, it was a clean copy, and one that had not printed the right-hand third of the last poster. Perfect!

We began with the first five steps of the Vocal Sequence again as a warm-up.

Jeff Allen then gave his new Neo-Futurist monolog to Barbara to read. It was a variation on the “I need to write something” trope, and it worked.

Jeff A. also had us read through “Give & Take,” a hysterical Neo-Futurist skit from 200 more Neo-Futurist plays. It would be fun to add to an evening of theatre.

We returned to part-2. Barbara suggested that we brainstorm as many ways to perform the text as we could thing of. Dale set the timer for two minutes, and we came up with:

  1. a monolog
  2. rearrange pieces of it
  3. backwards
  4. dramatic interpretation
  5. change the verbs
  6. as a dance
  7. mime, holding up the words
  8. metaperformance, like Jeff’s idea from last session
  9. choral anthem
  10. audition piece
  11. diagram the sentences
  12. as a Marx Bros. routine
  13. grade it as homework
  14. edit (??)
  15. make it rhyme
  16. talk back to it, sass it
  17. cycle through film genres
  18. props, without words
  19. hand puppets
  20. nude
  21. as a musical

Dale then used the random number generator to pick one, #4, dramatic interpretation, and we gave ourselves another two minutes:

  1. black box/empty set
  2. Chekhov
  3. political thriller
  4. children’s bedtime story
  5. Noh theatre
  6. gossiping over tea
  7. medieval mystery play
  8. opera
  9. absurdist piece
  10. elementary class play
  11. Julie Andrews vehicle
  12. dysfunctional family drama
  13. police procedural
  14. therapy session
  15. Seussian tale (??not sure of the handwriting)

Again with the random number generator, and again #4, the bedtime story. Barbara began telling us wee ones the bedtime story, and we both interspersed lines and repeated lines and added our own commentary. It was interesting.

We went back to the main list with the random number generator, and we got #1, monolog. Dale tackled it as a solo piece; miraculously, he convinced everyone he was making perfect sense.

Next was #6, dance, and Jeff danced the first page. We then drew #9, choral anthem, and skipped it.

Finally, Barbara took on #12, audition piece, and Dale was her auditioner, requesting expansions and redirections of the piece. Jeff was the janitor.

As a quickie ending, we threw out #15, Marx Bros., and got a couple of laughs with some delivery. Mike Funt: download the text and turn it into a Marx Bros. routine.

It occured to us that we could take the text and do an evening’s work with it, starting perhaps with the monolog so that the audience could get the whole piece at once, then hitting bits and pieces of the text through the filters of our list (and other ideas). The audience would begin to form their own connections and ideas, perhaps.

It was also suggested as a performance that we could have a pool of available texts, to be matched randomly with performance modes, and improvise performances that way.

Ideas for Neo-Futurist monologs:

  • grocery list; e.g., a piece about one’s grocery list, perhaps the one you’d like people to think you have
  • desktop; e.g., what’s on your desk and why

NEXT: Jan. 14, 6:30, NSOD

  • TEXTS: part-2, Jeff’s Myth [doc]
  • PATHS: Vocal Sequence
  • HOMEWORK:
    • Neo-Futurist script
    • five pages of text, either randomly selected from one’s own library, or some online library like Forgotten Books; multiple sources OK

Work Session, 12/17/08

(I thought I’d put something up before the year is quite over. Sorry about the delay.)

Present: Dale, Jeff B., Barbara, Jeff A.

Dale put up the huge poster version of Marc’s part-2 [rtf] and we all contemplated it for a moment.

Then Dale outlined the first five phases of the Vocal Sequence [pdf]:

  1. Speak silently.
  2. Speak normally.
  3. Slow motion.
  4. Introjecting.
  5. Project atmosphere.

We began playing with the VS, using selected phrases from the text. We assume we were getting introjection wrong; Marc was not there to guide us. We also decided that was completely OK. We were just getting our feet wet, and if we developed something useful, so much the better.

After working on the VS as our warmup, we tackled the text. Dale proposed as an exercise to treat the text as a vehicle for performance, unlimited by any reality. We began to color-code themes and strands and actually had an interesting time. We decided to keep our findings to ourselves and spring them on Marc at the next session.

Vocal Sequence and other structural issues

This extra post is to provide a forum for discussion of Dale’s suggestion that we open our sessions with Vocal Sequence work, and find further structure for sharing and creating work.

You can (and should) download the Vocal Sequence document on the Assignments page.

Discuss:

  • questions you have about the Vocal Sequence and its implementation
  • ideas for a variety of structures for rest the session; there is no reason to think we need only one way to proceed after our warmup.

Workshop (5/8/07)

[cross-posted from Dale’s blog]

We met to debrief the backers audition, congratulate ourselves, and prepare for the next phase.

We discussed whether to call the production A Visit to William Blake’s Inn or, as I had printed out in various fonts on the wall, William Blake’s Inn. I pointed out that we were talking three separate works here: Nancy’s book, my song cycle (both entitled A Visit...), and the stage show, the title of which was up for grabs. There was something to be said for separating the stage show from the other two.

Also, I pointed out that it’s nearly impossible to get the entire title balanced typographically. I know, since I’ve had to do it on flyers, post cards, posters, all kinds of things. There’s just no way.

However, Marc suggested making the logo such that William Blake’s Inn was the major visual component, with A Visit to not as noticeable above it. His point was that he hated to lose the idea of “a visit” in the title. We agreed with that. We also thought perhaps a professional graphic artist might have more flexible ideas.

I filled everyone in on what I knew about the Cultural Arts Commission’s role at this point, which is not much. We have a volunteer to head up the project, although whether she has volunteered to be über-producer or just the Scotland coordinator, even I am not clear. The Commission meets tomorrow, so we’ll know more then.

We defined what our role was going to be in this venture: we propose the budget; we workshop the piece and develop the script and visual materials; we work with the designer(s); we cast the show; we rehearse the show; we produce the educational materials for schools (book studies/music).

The organizing committee’s roles: produce the show; find space and resources; organize volunteers; raise money; pay bills; publicize the show; handle the Scotland connection; handle the Willard exhibit;

We think we really need to hire a technical director (TD) to supervise (and perhaps design) the sets and costume construction. We will need to pay the musical director. We should pay the director, though I blush to say it. We will need a real lighting designer and a sound engineer.

I’ve already defined the next three phases somewhere, but I’ll restate them here. During Phase 1 (Aug. 2007-May 2008), Lacuna will workshop the show and propose the budget; the Organizing Committee (WBOC) will begin organizing, raising money, lining up space and resources. During Phase 2 (Jan. 2008-Oct. 2008), Lacuna will design the educational materials and assist with the construction of costumes, etc.; WBOC will continue to raise money, begin to publicize, line up the Scotland and Willard things, start the construction process. During Phase 3 (Aug. 2008-Oct. 2008), Lacuna will audition and rehearse the show; WBOC will publicize and organize whatever needs to be done leading up to opening night.

All of this is a grand, fuzzy outline which we’ll have to clarify in many, many conversations with the WBOC. So off into Limbo we go!

Set crew

[cross-posted from Dale’s blog]

We met for set crew at Dale and Ginny’s house at 10:00 this morning, and by the time we finished, we got at least most of the items on our list started, although none of them were finished. We were hampered by not having a large enough crew, but those of us in attendance worked hard.

We started with the paper maché, since it had to dry before anything else could be done to it. Here we are starting the teacups and turtles:

The crew starting the teacups and turtles

Here’s Marc working on his turtle later:

Marc and his turtle

We also got the walls started, since we had to wallpaper them. The first step was to reinforce the edges so that they would flap over. We used some extremely sturdy corner packaging, originally used in shipping window blinds. Here are Molly and Carol Lee getting ready to cut one with a hacksaw:

Molly and Carol Lee with the corners

Marc and Dale took turns wallpapering the walls.

Dale wallpapering

Here’s one that’s done:

A wall

Mary Frances painted the edge reinforcements brown, sort of a wood-looking effect. She also painted the chair railings which we will have to attach later:

Mary Frances painting the woodwork

Ginny cut out the headpieces for the Toast Heads:

Ginny and the Toast Heads

Dale and Carol Lee worked on the Toast Head’s banners, which they hung on the fence to dry:

The banners drying

Galen measured out the lumber for the Sunflowers’ suitcases:

Galen measuring

We also got the snowdrifts and the Toast Heads’ instruments cut out of the cardboard.

So lots got started, but nothing got finished. I’ll assess all of that tomorrow.

After we exhausted ourselves with set crew, we had a cookout and just relaxed around a fire in the backyard. The weather was beautiful all day, and the evening was the same.

Workshop (4/18/07)

[cross-posted from Dale’s blog]

In attendance: Dale, Marc, Mary Frances, Molley, Laura, Melissa, and Carol Lee. We also had MMH Galen, Toast Head Maggie and Hedgehogs Taylor, Kennedy, Chiara, Preston, and Travis.

First up were the Hedgehogs. Heavens to betsy, are these cute critters!

This last one is of us all double-checking what hedgehog ears look like on my laptop. We decided to try knit caps with ears and noses attached to them, over their eggshell foam.

We worked bit by bit, starting with the hedgehog choreography and working our way backwards through the song. Eventually we added some “walls” and a fireplace for the hedgehogs to come bursting out of. We added Toast Heads. We added the Gang. I think it’s all going to be very merry, especially if we can get the Gang to the level that they actually look precise.

The hedgehogs are not very precise. We’ll work on that, but of course that is not the point. They’re there for cuteness.

They were troupers: they focused on what we needed to focus on, they hit their marks more often than not, and I think by the time we get to May 3, they’re going to be absolutely awesome.

After we sent them home, then we worked on Toast Head choreography. That was a lot shorter. In fact, it surprised me how little time it took to get that done. Of course, it takes forever to develop the choreography; transferring to real dancers (like Molly and Maggie) takes no time at all.

Finally, Galen arrived from his Music Man rehearsal, and we worked on the Marmalade Man’s stuff. I chatted a bit about how I had come to view the MM as a disruptive force in the Inn: he shows up, and things just get stirred up. He has that power, to straighten roads, to command the Gang to fall in for close order drill, to summon up hedgehogs, to change winter to spring. And yet when he’s done, things are better.

It’s sort of like Wallace Stevens’ image of the creative mind/act as a garden: sometimes you have to scrape it clean and start over. That’s the function of the MM, to make us all reexamine the status quo.

This is reflected in his choreography, all free and light and arms and legs and entrechats, while his Toast Heads are starched flat and the Gang marches in order.

Finally we tried to put it all together. It may be too much, but we’ll see next week.

Jonathan Hickman was there, shooting video for a small documentary/trailer for the May 3 thing. This is good.

In other news, I met with Don Nixon at the Centre, and he’s on board for the 2008 premiere. There’s some exciting stuff going on out there, folks.

Also, Ginny got the invitations printed, folded, and stuffed. Excelsior!

Workshop (4/11/07)

[cross-posted from Dale’s blog]

At noon I went to meet with the Newnan Cultural Arts Commission to offer the proposal for William Blake’s Inn. Everyone was supportive and excited. They decided to sponsor the May 3 performance and to begin looking at finding funding for the entire project, so that’s exciting. (You can download a PDF version of the prospectus.)

We had workshop tonight again. Tonight we worked with Denise Johnson on Two Sunflowers. Melissa is stepping in for Ginny, who will be out of pocket in the days before the performance. (Grayson has to come home from college or something.) We played with the four sunflowers Carol Lee provided and got the Two Sunflowers’ part all blocked out.

We went back over Man in the Marmalade Hat and plugged Denise into that. Then after she left we played more with the Sunflower Waltz. We got the beginning blocked out, but it has become very clear that the big, big parts of the waltz can’t be worked out through focus on the movements of individual sunflowers. We will have to use the masses of sunflowers and their movements to make sense of the music. Somebody should have thought of that before they let me write all that huge ballet music.

We’re moving into a new phase, less brainstorming and more implementation. It’s harder work.

In other news, Marc has been playing with ArtRage and has produced the following images:

Striking, a beautiful use of the program.

Workshop (4/10/07)

[cross-posted from Dale’s blog]

Back to work at the workshop! Dale, Marc, Laura, Carol Lee, and Melissa in attendance.

Dale and Carol Lee shared their autographed copies of A Visit to William Blake’s Inn, plus other fun stuff from New York. Dale talked about the meeting of the Cultural Arts Commission tomorrow and some of the ins and outs of getting ready for the backers auditions.

Our schedule called for us to work with members of the octet on their role for the May 3 performance. None showed up. Ginny did, but she was still dressed for work, and since Denise will be dropping by tomorrow night, we sent her home.

We decided instead to choreograph Man in the Marmalade Hat from start to finish. We worked on movement for the ToastHeads, and choreographed their movement onto the stage. We coordinated that with the ice sprites and left space for the MMH. (Galen will be in tomorrow night.)

We then switched to the Gang and their role in the piece, their close order drill. We had choreographed it before, but basically we had to reconstruct it.

Now it’s all written down, on our wall-size chart of the lyrics of the piece.

Before we left, Dale read through the prospectus he’s prepared for the Arts Commission. We discussed some kind of ideas for budget. We are having some phenomenal ideas, and it would be a shame to see them fall short because of a lack of funding. But all the indicators are that forces are lining up that will make it all possible.